skip to main content
Close Icon

In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way Informa uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.

Global Search Configuration

On 31 March 2017, the 322 metre long, 266,141 dwt VLOC bulk carrier Stellar Daisy sank in the South Atlantic Ocean on route to China. With 22 of the 24 crew members of the very large ore carrier Stellar Daisy still missing, many in the shipping industry have been asking why the vessel reportedly split and sank after taking on water following a hull crack 2,000 miles off Uruguay. The investigation is expected to take a long time and is likely to be inconclusive, but we do know that six serious deficiencies were found in the vessel this February but it was allowed to sail without any detention.


However, even as the actual reason why this incident took place remained unclear, some insurance officials pointed out that the speed of sinking and the high loss of life mirrored casualties related to liquefaction of cargoes such as iron ore and nickel ore.


With a high moisture content, iron ore has a propensity to liquefy during a voyage, which causes serious stability problems with a high possibility of capsizing. “Incidents due to liquefied cargoes can lead to serious perils, as the liquefied slush mounts quickly, brought on by vibrations and motions of the vessel, and the ships sink fast,” said a P&I club official.


“The wet cargoes change their state from ore fines or mineral concentrate to a viscous fluid that can undermine the balance of the ship.”


London P&I club says in its new guide on managing the risk of cargo liquefaction that the liquefied cargo can flow to one side in a roll in heavy seas, and that it would not return with the roll the other way, which progressively leads to the vessel capsizing.


Consignments that are prone to liquefying have to undergo proper testing of moisture content before being loaded, a measure described under the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code.


The code as it stands would possibly prevent many incidents due to liquefaction if it is followed strictly, as it sets out a maximum moisture content of the cargo which is considered safe for carriage in ships, known as total moisture limit.


The onus for these lab tests lies with the charterer, as it must provide the master of the vessel with written evidence that the moisture content does not exceed the TML. Upon the failure to provide such a certificate, the master should not load the cargo, said a Singapore-based vessel owner and operator.


“But unfortunately, the results from these tests are sometimes modified and false figures for the moisture content are presented, which leads to emergencies,” he said.


“However, the lab centres have an obligation to keep the sample of the cargo inspected by them for a period of two months,” he conceded, adding that in the case of Stellar Daisy this could provide essential evidence for an investigation.


Read more on Lloyd's List >


Last updated: 10/04/17

What is the law, and why do incidents continue to occur?

This booklet of extracts combines articles from Shipping and Trade Law and Maritime Risk International, as well as other sources on, to provide some background to liquefaction, summarise what the law is, and explore why incidents continue to occur.


  • Liquefaction: shipping industry response, Shipping & Trade Law, February 2017 (2017) 17 STL 1 4
  • Liqefaction of iron ore fines, Shipping & Trade Law, October 2016 (2016) 16 STL 8 3
  • On solid bulk liquefaction, Shipping & Trade Law, October 2016 (2016) 16 STL 8 1
  • Related resources on

Also of interest

  • Lloyd’s Law Reports: Maritime and Commercial, Lloyd’s Mariti...

    The New Flamenco

    14 Jul 2017

    The Supreme Court has ruled that in calculating damages for the repudiation of a charterparty, shipowners were not obliged to give credit to charterers for sale proceeds made by a sale in opportune market conditions. Read more on this important decision.

    Topics Law Maritime

  • Lloyd’s Law Reports: Maritime and Commercial, Lloyd’s Mariti...

    Maritime and Commercial Law August 2017 round up

    31 Aug 2017

    This booklet of extracts combines recent articles from Lloyd’s Law Reports and Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, as well as our news and analysis sources on, to provide a round-up of our must-see content from August 2017.

    Topics Law Maritime

  • Chinese Maritime and Commercial Law Reports, Lloyd’s Law Rep...

    Maritime law in 2016: a review of developments in case law

    31 Mar 2017

    By Dr Johanna Hjalmarsson

    Topics Law Maritime


Have any questions? Speak to a specialist.

Getting a demo tailored to your needs is the best way to see how our solutions will help you gain an advantage.

Request a live demo now.

Our customers rely on us to provide the trusted answers.

Sign up for your no obligation free trial and we will get in touch shortly.

Request a callback from our sales team to learn how Maritime Intelligence can provide a solution for your business.

If you prefer to get in touch directly, please visit our contact us section for our regional telephone numbers.

If you have any general questions about our services and would like to learn more about how we can assist your business, please reach out to us via the form below and we'll get back to you shortly. If you prefer to get in touch by phone, please refer to the contact us section of our website.